Clean Water: Trading or Traitor?
Date : Thu, 16 Oct 2008 11:05:30 -0400
For Immediate Release
Contact: Jeff Tittel
October 16, 2008
(609) 558-9100
Clean Water: Trading or Traitor?
Montclair, NJ - Today the Passaic River Institute of Montclair State
University held a symposium on issues related to the river. Among the
presenters was Christopher Obropta, who heads a team developing a plan for
pollution trading on the Passaic, which is plans to submit to the Department
of Environmental Protection (DEP). "The Passaic River is New Jersey's
version of De Nile River - the state is Denial about doing its job to
adequately protect the river," said Jeff Tittel, Director of the New Jersey
Sierra Club.
Trading pollution credits will not clean up the Passaic River, which
provides the water supply for nearly 4 million people. Not only does the
standard for sewer plants under this plan still allow four times the amount
of phosphorus discharge recommended by the Environmental Protection Agency
for a polluted river, trading credits would also allow a situation in which
pollution is moved from below a water supply intake to above it, putting
more pollution into the water the people of New Jersey are drinking.
The Passaic River is seriously compromised, with almost 100% of the water in
the summer being sewage discharge. In fact, in the summer of 1999, of the
72 million gallons in the river at the Little Falls water supply intake, 70
million gallons were sewer plant discharge. These nutrients also produce so
much algae in the summer that all the oxygen is sucked out of the river,
making it a running stagnant river that will not support aquatic life.
Since 1986 the DEP has known about these problems with water quality on the
river, caused by nutrients coming from both sewer plants and non-point
pollution. Instead of working to clean up the river, however, the
department has given one excuse after another to get around this obligation.
Earlier this year, the DEP came forward with a plan called the Total Maximum
Daily Load (TMDL), ostensibly to clean up the river. "This plan should be
called Too Many Darn Loopholes," commented Tittel. "The TMDL proposed by
the DEP will not clean up the river and puts the Passaic at risk as a future
source of drinking water. Rather than cleaning up the river, this trading
scheme would only add yet another loophole."
"Rather than entertaining this Bush Administration shell game, the
Department of Environmental Protection needs to do its job and enforce the
Clean Water Act, which has been requiring the clean up of the Passaic River
for more than 20 years," concluded Tittel. "The state has been ignoring
this responsibility for two decades - now it is trying to make human waste
part of pay-to-play in New Jersey."
##########
Becca Glenn, Program Assistant
New Jersey Sierra Club
145 W. Hanover Street
Trenton, NJ 08618
609-656-7612: phone
609-656-7618: fax
Received on 2008-10-16 08:10:02
|